New Sphere Telescope Findings Disproves Existence of Binary Star Systems

Magnetic field variations in a single large star V471 Tauri, as explained by SPHERE scientists, refutes old theories that propose the existence of a tiny second companion star in a binary star system. Binary star systems are theoretical, and used in wrong types of supernova gravity models, to measure distances and dark energy expansion rates of galaxies.

 No smaller orbiting companion star was detected by the SPHERE team, so there is not a "second star" that they keep mumbling about that they can't find. The best new SPHERE telescope has proven that an irrefutably accepted binary star system in the big-bang stellar classification system is wrong. All standard theories about binary star systems being common in the universe are wrong. Dark energy expansion rates measured by binary supernovas are altogether phony, being likely there is only one large star exploding.

When will they stop calling it an "unusual binary star system" and come out to say it is a single star? Why can't they say they were wrong predicting it?

The new SPHERE telescope proves an electric and magnetic universe exists, with dogmatic scientists always shocked and puzzled over their failures to detect what they propose.

Famous Possible Alien Spaceship 1991 VG Returns Near Earth in 2016 to be Visible for the ISS to Photograph

Electric Solar System Model by University of Maryland Refutes Black Holes and Proves the Electromagnetic Cosmic Ray Driven Dynamo Cosmology

Sun's Heliospheric Jets are self-similar to the Crab Nebula Supernova and galactic centers

Galactic black holes are explained away because electrical Birkeland currents shape and power the jets, and not gravity. So called medium sized black holes have been proven to not exist, being enormous powerful pulsars.

Plasma size scaling laws discovered by Hannes Alfven are the same mechanism driving the sun's heliosphere jets and the crab nebula.

I sometimes love and laugh over how in cosmology, there are so many new "accidental discoveries" that shock the scientists into telling everybody the scientific truth, that has been discussed in forums by the Electric Universe website founders 10 years ago, and over 8 years of blogging myself. Most plasma physicists who study cosmology disbelieve in the big bang, like famous nobel prize winning physicist Hanes Alfven who first predicted magnetic fields in outer space shaping the universe. Alfven's cosmology is proven true.

South pole coronal hole on the sun

Earth's Birkeland currents

Birkeland currents at the center of the Milky Way galaxy.

Binary Supernova Hysteria Claims Predictive Proof for Type Ia Standard Candle Models

Two photos of the huge nebula Henize 2-428 containing millions of stars, has a bipolar shape that gravity scientists cannot explain. Peering inside this vast nebula, they accidently discover a binary star system located "near the center" that cannot possibly explain the electromagnetic bipolar shape of the entire nebula. According to math models the binary stars are predicted to supernova in 700 million years, which becomes their ludicrous basis for claiming they are the first ones to find and predict a future type Ia supernova event.

There is strong evidence that a massive star will be born by the merger of two stars, without even a supernova event taking place, informs cosmologist +phxmarker mark .

Type Ia Supernova Hysteria over an analysis that merely identifies two nearly equal mass stars, by conjecturing along with a wrong silly big-bang dogma theory that standard candles light vast measurable distances in the universe.

Yardsticks and meter sticks don't measure cosmic distances. That's how gravity scientists think. Stars that supernova all have different masses that produce widely different amounts of radiation. Some massive stars don't even supernova, and some low mass white dwarfs might supernova under certain circumstances.

Two different type Ia supernova models are both purported in the big-bang cosmology as being correct, even though the masses of the individual stars widely vary in a binary system. According to theory, as long as one of the two stars is above the Chandrasekhar mass limit, it will still produce a standard candle. Stars in wide ranges more massive than 15 solar masses are still magically going to be standard candles, according to mathematical interpretations of trickery that won a Nobel prize. This big-bang peer reviewed enforced cosmology, almost gave away a Nobel prize last year for detecting gravity waves, until just recently it was confirmed to be a signature of cosmic dust.

 Electric filamentary currents in the Veil nebula

4 protostars in an assumed binary star system are all moving apart, and will likely be ejected to become single stars.