Superfluid vacuum medium centers for particles, atoms, stars, galaxies, hyperclusters
Sunday, October 14, 2012
Red Giant Star R Sculptoris Ejects 3D Spiral Structure Into the ISM
The first sets of observations using the most powerful new radio telescope, shows a 3D spiral of material coming out from a star, together with a surrounding spherical shaped enveloping shell. In order to describe the spiral structure, team scientists ran computer gravity simulations using a binary star system, to fit the observations. Planetary nebulae have also been previously described having these "UNSEEN BINARIES" to support a gravitational explanation, even though magnetic fields are proven to be shaping them. No binary star companion for R Sculptoris has ever been detected, yet they claim a very tiny companion star of 0.2 solar mass is most likely shaping the wind into the spiral structure by gravity. New star models will be required to explain this spiral vortex structure, because in every known example these nearby companion binary stars are never found . When ALMA is fully operational in 2013, prepare for the excitement from many new findings of single stars having the same spiral structures.
LL Pegasi is also a single star, predicted to have a binary companion because it has a similar spiral structure. It appears to lack the outer surrounding spherical shaped envelope shell in older photos, but has not yet been photographed by ALMA. In 2013 (ALMA) Atacama Large Millimeter / Submillimeter Array will be fully completed, and will show full interior 3D structures.
All of these examples are cited in the paper to try and explain the envelopes and spiral structures as produced by an unseen undetected binary star, but the proof is entirely lacking in every case for an existing companion star.
the old red giant star "U Camelopardalis" is a single star that has an outer shell. Its spiral envelope structure will likely be detected in 2013 when the new telescope is completed.
Common anciently evolved red giant stars are largely responsible for filling the interstellar medium with newly ejected spiral material that will form new nebula and stars.
Miles Mathis, in his paper The Moon Reveals her Secrets, shows how gravity is incorrect and proposes an EM field (or other) to explain: E/M field of the Moon is quite sufficient to make up the difference between 1/3.67 and 1/6. I will go even further and show that the E/M field of the Moon is exactly sufficient to make up that difference. This will prove that the total weight-causing fields of both the Earth and the Moon are sums of the gravitational field and the E/M field, and that the solo gravitational fields can be shown to vary exactly as the radius of the object. The math above also implies that all celestial bodies, including exotics like black holes and neutron stars, have gravitational fields that vary as their radii vary. It suggests in the strongest possible way that the huge additional forces hypothesized for exotics are either wrong or are mainly a function of a super-strong E/M field, solar winds, or other as yet unknown interactions,
Notes on the Holy Grail of Modern Physics
-
Notes on the Holy Grail of Modern Physics by Mathias Hüfner While cleaning
out my library, I came across the book “Three Roads to Quantum Gravity” by
Lee ...
Hidden Supersymmetry of Electrostatic Fields
-
Juan D. García-Muñoz, A Raya A hidden supersymmetry of electrostatic fields
is evidenced. Proposing an ansatz for the electrostatic potential as the
natura...
The Fall and Rise of Betelgeuse
-
With its recent uptick in brightness, Betelgeuse appears to be slowly
returning to normal. But will it? Astronomers urge us to keep watch.
The post The F...
The proteins that domesticated our genomes
-
EPFL scientists have carried out a genomic and evolutionary study of a
large and enigmatic family of human proteins, to demonstrate that it is
responsibl...
Miles Mathis, in his paper The Moon Reveals her Secrets, shows how gravity is incorrect and proposes an EM field (or other) to explain: E/M field of the Moon is quite sufficient to make up the difference between 1/3.67 and 1/6. I will go even further and show that the E/M field of the Moon is exactly sufficient to make up that difference. This will prove that the total weight-causing fields of both the Earth and the Moon are sums of the gravitational field and the E/M field, and that the solo gravitational fields can be shown to vary exactly as the radius of the object.
ReplyDeleteThe math above also implies that all celestial bodies, including exotics like black holes and neutron stars, have gravitational fields that vary as their radii vary. It suggests in the strongest possible way that the huge additional forces hypothesized for exotics are either wrong or are mainly a function of a super-strong E/M field, solar winds, or other as yet unknown interactions,